[topicmapmail] TMShare: Reified statements

Graham Moore gra at networkedplanet.com
Wed Oct 22 05:32:07 EDT 2008

I think you are right.

Graham Moore, Director, Networked Planet Limited
Editor XTM 1.0, ISO13250 (TopicMaps) -2,-3, TMCL
e: graham.moore at networkedplanet.com
w: www.networkedplanet.com
t: +44 1865 811131 
m: +44 7769658611 (UK)
m: +47 45271713   (Norway)

Networked Planet Limited is registered in England and Wales, no. 5273377
-----Original Message-----
From: topicmapmail-bounces at infoloom.com
[mailto:topicmapmail-bounces at infoloom.com] On Behalf Of Lars Heuer
Sent: 21 October 2008 17:52
To: topicmapmail at infoloom.com
Subject: [topicmapmail] TMShare: Reified statements

Hi Marc,
hi Graham,

The longer I think about it, the more I convince myself that reified
statements should be part of the fragment (c.f.

Even if the described algorithm does not forbid to implement the
fragment algorithm with included reified statements (incl.
dependencies i.e. the parent topic if an occurrence / a name is
reified), it should be normative, otherwise this information will be
lost if a fragment is created.


Best regards,
http://www.topicmaps.de/mailinglist/ German Topic Maps mailinglist

topicmapmail mailing list
topicmapmail at infoloom.com

More information about the topicmapmail mailing list