[topicmapmail] A blog entry...
Jan Algermissen
jalgermissen@topicmapping.com
Mon, 5 Sep 2005 08:41:02 +0200
Patrick, Murray,
nice answers. Two points to add:
- Topic Maps are not bound to a heap of underlying architecture/
semantics
as for example HTML or RDF; it is next to impossible to be as
simple as
HTML or RDF if there are no assumptions to be made whatsoever.
Consider the notion of an HTML link....how simple would *that* be
if you
removed all of HTTP/URI semantics from HTML?
- Despite its inherent simplicity.....who thinks RDF is presented in
a way that
its easy to understand???
Jan
On Sep 5, 2005, at 12:26 AM, Jan Algermissen wrote:
>
> http://www.rtodd.com/blog/archives/2005/08/the_trouble_wit.htm
>
> Hmm....
>
> True/False?
>
> Jan
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> _________________
> Jan Algermissen, Consultant & Programmer
> http://jalgermissen.com
> Tugboat Consulting, 'Applying Web technology to enterprise IT'
> http://www.tugboat.de
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> topicmapmail mailing list
> topicmapmail@infoloom.com
> http://www.infoloom.com/mailman/listinfo/topicmapmail
>
________________________________________________________________________
_______________
Jan Algermissen, Consultant & Programmer
http://jalgermissen.com
Tugboat Consulting, 'Applying Web technology to enterprise IT'
http://www.tugboat.de