[topicmapmail] Fragmented XTM for web metadata, and some ontology?
Peter P. Jones
ppj@concept67.fsnet.co.uk
Sun, 29 Jun 2003 22:57:14 +0100
On 29 Jun 2003 at 17:31, Murray Altheim wrote:
> >
> > The content model in the DTD would have to become
> > <!ELEMENT resourceData ANY >
> >
> > Ick.
>
> No, that's a common misunderstanding. "ANY" means any declared
> element, not any markup. That would mean that any declared XTM element
> could appear anywhere within an occurrence, which would be only partly
> as bad as allowing any markup whatsoever. Absent a schema,
> interpretation is pretty much a guess.
Right, but there's nothing to stop me adding a DOCTYPE to the
instance to declare entities. Then any would mean ANY.
>
> Murray
>
> ......................................................................
> ..... Murray Altheim
> http://kmi.open.ac.uk/people/murray/ Knowledge Media Institute The
> Open University, Milton Keynes, Bucks, MK7 6AA, UK
> .
>
> "There's a lot of intelligence out there that you don't
> know if it's true or not." -- Anonymous US official
> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/3014850.stm
>
> _______________________________________________
> topicmapmail mailing list
> topicmapmail@infoloom.com
> http://www.infoloom.com/mailman/listinfo/topicmapmail
>