[topicmapmail] PSIs?

[Lars Marius Garshol]

* Martin Bryan
| 
| To me, using identifiers for datatypes that reference the formal W3C
| definitions of these datatypes makes more sense than inventing
| separate PSIs.

I agree completely. Especially when the W3C is already using those
same URIs.

| (I'm also thinking about how we should reference these datatypes
| within Part 5 of the forthcoming DSDL spec, of which I am the
| editor, so I have a specific use for whatever PSIs we end up in
| mind. Referring to the W3C addresses makes more sense in an ISO
| standard than does referencing PSIs originating from a non-standards
| body.)

In that case I think WG1 and WG3 should agree on a solution to this
that is used both by DSDL and by TMCL. Probably something to settle in
London. 

-- 
Lars Marius Garshol, Ontopian         <URL: http://www.ontopia.net >
GSM: +47 98 21 55 50                  <URL: http://www.garshol.priv.no >