[topicmapmail] PSIs?

Murray Altheim m.altheim@open.ac.uk
Thu, 17 Apr 2003 12:48:29 +0100


Lars Marius Garshol wrote:
> * Murray Altheim
> | 
> | I would be publishing a specification that overlaps a domain owned
> | by somebody else. The W3C may wish to publish a PSI set. PSIs are
> | very likely to be considered IP, and I think that even though we're
> | new to this territory, my guess is that it's a *very bad* idea for
> | me to publish PSIs using their URLs.
> 
> I agree it is bad for you to create URIs in their domain, but you
> wouldn't be doing that in this case. OWL already uses the same URIs,
> so you would just be following OWLs lead. I think it's much better for
> us to use the same URIs as the W3C for what is certainly the same
> subjects. 
> 
>   <URL: http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-ref/#rdf-datatype >

OWL was published by the W3C. I don't see how this is relevant.

>  * Lars Marius Garshol
> |
> | What I'm trying to say is that if I download datatypes.xtm and load
> | it from a local file and merge it with one of my own topic maps that
> | use the PSIs defined by you they won't merge because the PSIs
> | defined by you won't actually be in datatypes.xtm.
>  
> * Murray Altheim
> |
> | Yes it will. Downloaded or on the web, the datatypes.xtm document
> | has a base URL that is identical, [...]
> 
> The base URL given by xml:base doesn't affect the resolution of the
> IDs of <topic> elements. Officially this XTM issue isn't resolved yet,
> but I don't see how it can be resolved any other way.

Yes it does. It's not an XTM issue, it's an XML issue that has already
been resolved. Read the spec (particularly the examples in section 3):

    http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlbase/

That's the whole point of xml:base. What other purpose could it serve?
XTM is an XML application. We're already using xml:base in applications.
We could decide *not to*, but that'd be foolish. It's there to serve
exactly the purpose of document portability demanded here.

> <URL: http://www.ontopia.net/omnigator/models/topic_complete.jsp?tm=tm-standards.xtm&id=xtm-same-doc-refs >
> 
> Proposed resolution in:
> <URL: http://www.y12.doe.gov/sgml/sc34/document/0399.htm#xtm-same-doc-refs >
> 
> This will be discussed at the SC34 meeting in London, btw.
> 
> | If I have this much difficulty I hate to think what a newbie is
> | going to suffer in trying to publish PSIs.
> 
> The people who published <URL: http://psi.uio.no > were newbies and
> had no problems at all. They followed the recommendations, though.

I am having no problems. I am discussing with you design decisions.
You are disagreeing with them. I have done nothing that disagrees
with the recommendations so far as I can see (esp. after I make it
clear that the things labeled "PSIs" are the PSIs, since that is
apparently not clear enough now.

Murray

......................................................................
Murray Altheim                  <http://kmi.open.ac.uk/people/murray/>
Knowledge Media Institute
The Open University, Milton Keynes, Bucks, MK7 6AA, UK

    Boundless wind and moon - the eye within eyes,
    Inexhaustible heaven and earth - the light beyond light,
    The willow dark, the flower bright - ten thousand houses,
    Knock at any door - there's one who will respond.
                                     -- The Blue Cliff Record