| A Standards Based Automotive Electronic Service Manual | Table of contents | Indexes | XML and CDF: GCA's XML Conference Web Site | |||
| Template Tools Web Template | Web Template Design: The Need for New Tools |
British Columbia ![]() Canada ![]() Karatal, Kerem NCompass Labs Inc. Vancouver ![]() | Kerem
Karatal
Director of Technology, NCompass Labs Inc.
Biographical notice Kerem Karatal is the Director of Technology and cofounder of NCompass Labs Inc., a leading supplier of enterprise Web content management solutions. As Director of Technology, Kerem is the visionary behind the product direction and development at NCompass Labs. Prior to NCompass Labs, he worked on multimedia technology and collaborative software at IBM’s T.J. Watson Research Center. An authority and innovator in WEB technologies, Kerem’s notable achievements include the introduction of OLE controls to the WEB, now known as ActiveX. |
ActiveX ![]() NCompass Web Site ![]() | Introduction |
| Can you imagine a skyscraper built without an initial architectural and engineering design? Would you consider building an airplane without designing it first? Of course not, and you would be out of your mind to do so. Nobody would consider undertaking any engineering project without first completing a design and plan for the project. |
| And yet, this is the ad-hoc manner Web sites are created today. It is so easy to use your favorite editor to write an HTML page and link it to other pages; so easy in fact that sites are built page by page, link by link, without an overall structure. But, when the number of pages on a site grows beyond a certain point, the site becomes unmaintainable. First generation content management tools attempt to impose some order on the chaos, but there is a limit to their effectiveness when the fundamental problem is the page-at-a- time development process. |
| In this paper we first discuss the requirements for the next generation Web sites, including device and audience personalization. Second, we introduce the W3C standards that can be used to meet these requirements. Finally we introduce the template based Web site as a natural solution to the problems of a next generation Web site and discuss the requirements for a template-authoring tool to help designers create a template based Web site. |
| Forrester IDC | Web sites today and tomorrow |
| HTML was initially invented for exchanging technical documents between different university departments over the Web. Web sites grew from those small university departments and individual sites to the Amazon.com and cnn.com sites of today. The content in those Web sites grew from tens of pages to 100,000 pages for large sites like Intel or Microsoft's. |
| Looking at today's sites we see that most of them are created for a general audience. According to a Forrester forum dated March 1998, only 13% of the surveyed Web sites are using personalization techniques to create personalized views for visitors. Sites will continue to grow, averaging 15000 pages in size. And companies will realize that personalization for different audiences is one of the most important weapons in applications like electronic commerce, direct marketing, and services. As a result the Web sites will turn into big applications with no single source tree. |
| Another Forrester report dated June 1998 points out that 44% of Web sites surveyed are creating lowest common denominator sites and are not thinking about optimizing their sites to use the technologies made available by the 4.0 generation browsers. Futhermore, most current Web sites are only created for desktop computer access, since it is the most commonly form of Web access available today. However this is beginning to change, as we move into the future we already see devices other than desktop computers being used to access Web sites requiring sites designed to match their unique characteristics. Another Forrester report mentions that "New devices weighing 8 ounces or less will make up 40% of a large company's portfolio." According to International Data Corporation (IDC) the sales of appliances used for Web access will match that of today's PC sales. |
PDA ![]() Personalization WebTV | New challenges - device and audience profile personalization |
| Studies, conducted by research firms like Forrester show that designers need to create increasingly personalized Web sites. After all, the Web is primarily about effective communication and effective communication means optimizing the presentation for the profile of the person who is accessing the Web site. We can separate the profiles into two main categories: |
| Device profiles deal with the different devices that people use to access a Web site such as desktop computers, Web TVs and PDAs. Each of these devices has its own device profile and the layout and content requirements for different devices may differ drastically. For example on a Web TV system, the following guidelines play an important role: |
| On the other hand, the guidelines for a PDA are quite different: |
| The above examples show that the layout and style requirements change drastically from one platform to another. As a result it is necessary to create different versions of the same page for different platforms. Designing for the lowest common denominator no longer works since designers can no longer rely on the limited layout standardization provided by the basic form factor of the PC. |
| Unlike device profiles, which deal with client and platform variations, audience profiles mainly deal with the personal profiles like age, salary bracket, gender and interests of the person accessing the Web site. Giving people what they need creates a much more pleasant and useful experience for the end users which may lead to more sales for an ecommerce site or more satisfied customers for a services based site. |
| Building a site that includes audience and device personalization immediately and dramatically increases the complexity of the site and result in a site that is no longer static and one-dimensional. Every new personalization combination adds a new dimension to the site tree, making it almost impossible to maintain and visualize. Changes in profiles can not be easily reflected to the pages, such as simple changes in content. Static HTML page type Web sites become totally infeasible. |
Active Server Pages CSS, Cascading Style Sheets ![]() Cold Fusion Internet Explorer ![]() Java Server Pages Java Servlets Scripting | Current approaches to dynamically generated sites |
| The solution to the problems introduced in the previous section looks obvious. We need to separate the content from its presentation and format. Many leading Web designers have already seen the problem and have started creating solutions based on separating content from its format either on the client or, as in the majority of cases, on the server. |
| One of the interesting client side solutions used today, is the popular www.idg.net site. The version of this site that runs on Internet Explorer 4.0 uses a client side scripting technology and client side data source objects to show the current and personalized news to the subscribers. A data source object receives the content in a pure text format and then the content is bound to the layout HTML via some proprietary HTML extensions introduced by Microsoft. |
| There are also many other sites using server side technologies like Active Server Pages, Cold Fusion, Java Servlets and Java Server Pages to generate pages dynamically based on content stored in a backend database. Usually these environments let the Web designers create pages to connect to backend database via a component and markup the content with HTML and CSS to generate a presentation of the content. |
| Whether it is server side or client side, these technologies generally require a lot of programming to do the repetitive task of getting the content from a data source and marking it up with the correct presentation tags. The disadvantages of such systems include: |
CSS, Cascading Style Sheets ![]() W3C ![]() XML ![]() XSL ![]() | A standards based approach |
| The World Wide Web consortium (W3C) has been working on standards for separating the content from its format. The first such standard emerged as a recommendation from W3C was Cascading Style Sheets (CSS). CSS mainly separates the style from the layout and content, by making it possible to create style sheets outside a HTML document. So basically you can change how a paragraph should look like by changing the attributes such as font etc. to a paragraph within these CSS files. |
| In February 1998, the W3C proposed Extensible Markup Language (XML) 1.0 as a recommendation. XML enables the tagging of content with content descriptive names rather than layout related names. After its introduction, it became possible to use XML and CSS together to create a presentation of the XML content. In this case CSS serves as medium to describe the layout and style and XML describes the content. However one immediate problem with using XML and CSS together is the fact that the XML content implicitly defines the order of the content which is an aspect of layout. In other words, CSS applied to XML content can not re-order the content or use it in different places on a page. So XML and CSS do not truly separate content from its format. |
| The Extensible Style Language (XSL) was proposed in 1997, as a language to not only format but also transform the content described in XML format. XSL selectively applies rules to patterns in the source content. Using this approach, an XML tree can be transformed into another XML tree. With XSL it becomes possible to re-order and re-use content in different places within a layout unlike the XML + CSS combination. For Web applications, XML content can be transformed to HTML + CSS or HTML only. The only interdependency that remains between the content and format is the schema of the source content. XSL applies rules to the elements that are defined in the source XML schema, so if the schema changes then the XSL rules become invalid, making it very important to design a schema right the first time. The major disadvantages of XSL are: |
| The standards we discussed above make it possible to create a dynamic Web site declaratively rather than using scripting languages. The scripting languages can still be used for more programming related tasks, such as adding business logic to a Web site. More importantly though, via the standards like XML and XSL, tool vendors can create tools that can interoperate with each other and can be used at different Web application servers. |
| Cold Fusion Studio Dreamweaver Front Page Powersite Template Authoring Visual Interdev schema ![]() | Template based authoring |
| The requirements of the next generation Web sites make it more and more difficult to maintain a Web site based on static HTML pages that do not separate content from its format. In house personalization solutions based on scripting are of limited viability because of the heavy programming requirements along with testing and maintenance costs. Standard solutions are needed to avoid having everyone reinvent the wheel to solve the repetitive problem of binding to a data source and applying format to the data. |
| If static pages are not the solution how can we author the new generation Web sites? Are there any tools for it? There are a lot of tools for creating page-at-a-time Web sites including FrontPage, Dreamweaver etc. which deal with the creation of pages but not templates. On the other side of the spectrum, there are tools for software developers to create their own home-brewed template based Web sites including Visual Interdev, Powersite, Cold Fusion Studio etc. |
| Moving into template based Web sites requires tools for creating templates, without the need for programming. These are new tools because templates are intrinsically different from content pages in many ways: |
Content Management ![]() Template Authoring Tool WebDAV ![]() | Requirements for a template authoring tool |
| As discussed in the previous sections, template authoring is different than content authoring and there is a definite need for a template-authoring tool specifically designed for this purpose. Some of the requirements for such a tool can be listed as follows: |
Web Site ![]() | Conclusion |
| Web sites of the future will be very complex applications that people will expect to use in their daily lives. The promise of the Web for effective communication can only be kept if Web sites are designed to tailor the right content to the right audience. Otherwise they are no different than the printed brochures sent to people's homes everyday. And everyone knows what people do with those brochures. |
| As the Web sites become complex, it becomes almost impossible to create one without a proper design. Every engineering project requires proper design and analysis and Web sites are engineering projects. As a result we need tools to support the engineering of Web sites. Most of the tools that exist today are for creating ad- hoc, page-at-a-time Web pages. They do not let designers separate content from its format. So we need tools in this area and these tools have very different requirements. Standards based tools that do not lock the designers into proprietary solutions and that interoperate with various other standards based content management systems, application servers are the future of the Web development tools |
References |
| A Standards Based Automotive Electronic Service Manual | Table of contents | Indexes | XML and CDF: GCA's XML Conference Web Site | |||